Indirect costs of inflammatory bowel diseases : Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis : a systematic review

Introduction: Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis are lifelong illnesses which have a significant impact on quality of life and personal burden through a reduction in the ability to work, sick leave and restrictions of leisure time. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the indirect costs of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Material and methods: The search was carried out in Medline, EMBASE, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, and reference lists of identified articles and reference lists of identified articles were also handsearched. All costs were adjusted to 2013 USD values by using the consumer price index and purchasing power parity. Identified studies were then analysed in order to assess their heterogeneity and possibility of inclusion in the meta-analysis. Results: Eleven of the identified publications presented indirect costs of Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. The range of estimated yearly indirect costs per patient was large, from $1 159.09 for loss of earnings to$14 135.64 for lost productivity and sick leave for Crohn’s disease. The values for ulcerative colitis ranged from $926.49 to$6 583.17. Because of the imprecise definition of methods of indirect cost calculations as well as heterogeneity of indirect cost components, a meta-analysis was not performed. Conclusions: The indirect costs of ulcerative colitis seem to be slightly lower than in the case of Crohn’s disease. A small number of studies referring to indirect costs of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis were identified, which indicates the need to conduct further investigations on this problem

Cost-effectiveness of biological treatment of ulcerative colitis : a systematic review

The aim of this systematic review was to collect and summarise all current data on the cost-effectiveness of biological treatment in ulcerative colitis. A literature search was conducted using the Medline, Embase, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases and included all cost-effectiveness analyses comparing biological treatment with any comparator. We identified 277 records of which 10 were included in this review. Eighty percent of identified analyses used quality-adjusted life years (QALY) as a measure of outcome. The most commonly assessed biological agent was infliximab. Half of the eight economic analyses, with QALY as an outcome, showed the cost-effectiveness of biological treatment against the comparator. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) ranged from 15,748 euro to 450,791 euro. The highest ICER values were observed when biologicals were compared with standard care alone. This systematic review revealed that in some cases the biological treatment, despite its clinical effectiveness, is too expensive and exceeds the national threshold value

Disease activity, quality of life and indirect costs of reduced productivity at work, generated by Polish patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the association between activity of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and decrease in quality of life as well as productivity loss of affected patients in a specified group of patients in the Polish setting. Material and methods: An questionnaire survey was conducted using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) to assess disease activity, as well as the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaires to assess productivity loss; quality of life was presented as utility calculated using the EuroQol 5 questionnaire and also measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Indirect costs were assessed with the human capital approach implying gross domestic product per capita or gross value added per worker in Poland in 2014 and were expressed in Polish zlotys (PLN) as well as in euros. Correlation was presented using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results: We performed our analysis based on 78 full questionnaires collected. A mean BASDAI score of 5.91 in the analysed group of patients was detected and mean utility of 0.5135 was observed. Average quality of life measured on the visual analogue scale was 46.55. Mean number of days off work was 45.26 days per year and mean on-the-job productivity loss was 49.29%. Average annual indirect costs per patient were €4241 (17 686 PLN) calculated using gross domestic product and €10 172 (42 417 PLN) estimated using gross value added. Total productivity loss was significantly correlated with disease activity (strong correlation of 0.6005) and utility (moderate correlation of –0.3698). Conclusions: Ankylosing spondylitis causes a great decrease in quality of life as well as patients’ productivity loss associated with both absenteeism and presenteeism. The greater the disease activity is, the lower is the utility, the lower is the quality of life measured on the VAS, and the greater are the total annual indirect costs. Total indirect costs were negatively correlated with utility; although the association was moderate, it was significant

An indirect comparison of infliximab versus adalimumab or golimumab for active ulcerative colitis

Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare adalimumab or golimumab with infliximab in patients with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Material and methods: This paper was prepared according to the PRISMA guidelines. The systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. No direct head-to-head comparisons for infliximab vs. adalimumab or golimumab were available so an indirect comparison according to the Bucher method was performed after a homogeneity evaluation of the included studies. Results: Six RCTs were included in the systematic review. An indirect comparison was performed, which revealed that infliximab was more effective in inducing clinical response compared with both doses of adalimumab (160/80 mg or 80/40 mg; p < 0.05), and, in clinical remission, infliximab was more effective than adalimumab (only for a dosage regime of 80/40 mg; p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in clinical response and clinical remission were observed between infliximab and golimumab in the induction phase. A significant (p < 0.05) advantage only of infliximab compared with adalimumab at doses of 80/40 mg and 80/160 mg was seen in terms of clinical response in the maintenance phase (up to 52-54 weeks). The indirect comparison revealed that serious adverse events were significantly more frequent among patients treated with a maintenance dose of 100 mg of golimumab compared with those treated with infliximab (p < 0.05). Conclusions: No significant differences in efficacy in the maintenance phase between infliximab and golimumab or adalimumab were revealed. Infliximab proved to be more effective than adalimumab but of similar efficacy to that of golimumab in the induction phase

Relationship between physician-based assessment of disease activity, quality of life, and costs of ulcerative colitis in Poland

The aim of this systematic review was to collect and summarise all current data on the cost-effectiveness of biological treatment in ulcerative colitis. A literature search was conducted using the Medline, Embase, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases and included all cost-effectiveness analyses comparing biological treatment with any comparator. We identified 277 records of which 10 were included in this review. Eighty percent of identified analyses used quality-adjusted life years (QALY) as a measure of outcome. The most commonly assessed biological agent was infliximab. Half of the eight economic analyses, with QALY as an outcome, showed the cost-effectiveness of biological treatment against the comparator. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) ranged from 15,748 euro to 450,791 euro. The highest ICER values were observed when biologicals were compared with standard care alone. This systematic review revealed that in some cases the biological treatment, despite its clinical effectiveness, is too expensive and exceeds the national threshold value

Moderately Pluralistic Methodology

The paper outlines and discusses the major tenets of moderately pluralistic methodology. The latter is juxtaposed to J. Życiński’s principle of natural interdisciplinarity. It instantiates scientific pluralism as a domain-specific agenda for research. The symbolic and causal understanding are integrated in this methodological conception by means of a specific kind of counterfactual reasoning, which is coined the delimiting counterfactual. It makes the moderately pluralistic methodology applicable to non-experimental research.Artykuł prezentuje i omawia zasadnicze założenia koncepcji umiarkowanie pluralistycznej metodologii. Ta ostatnia jest zbieżna z J. Życińskiego zasadą naturalności interdyscyplinarnej. Reprezenuje ona szeroko rozumiany nurt pluralizmu naukowego w zakresie sposobu prowadzenia badań w danej dziedzinie. W tej koncepcji połączone są dwa poziomy rozumienia symboliczny i przyczynowy za pomocą swoistego rodzaju wnioskowań kontrfaktycznych, określonych tu jako rozgraniczających wnioskowań kontrfaktycznych. Dzięki nim umiarkowanie pluralistyczna metodologia ma zastosowanie do badań nieeksperymentalnych